What is Computerized system and why Computerized System Validation required

 

What is Computerized system and why Computerized System Validation required:-

In the era of automization, everything is depended on computerized technology. To find out erroneous free result, to avoid long taking time, to reduce manpower, to avoid manual write-up, to avoid arrangement of hard documents, to avoid any loss of paper, to avoid any entry missing, to find out immediate search availability etc. the Industry is going to depended on automization.

The meaning of automization is activity to be performed by Instrument/ Equipment with help of Computer. Respective Instrument/ Equipment/ Machine is controlled through a well-designed software. The software installed on a separate workstation (Computer) or inbuilt CPU. The activity is done by Instrument/ Equipment/ Machine through predefined program or sequences of Instructions. After completion of activity, results or output generated.

In case of documentation activity, designed software follows the Instructions and generates electronic documents. Respective electronic documents can be used in hybrid form. The meaning of hybrid is combination of hard and soft copies.

Computerized System: -  The computerized system are a device which generates electronic records and these records can be create, modify, archive, backup, restored, shared, signed with the help of relevant software by given program or set of instructions.

In pharmaceutical Industry nothing allowed to use without qualify/ validate for manufacturing or testing of drug component. Hence, before introduction of these computerized systems in premises a complete strategy to be defined from before procurement to retire of these systems i.e. complete life cycle.

The GAMP-5 provides a detailed methodology to handle life cycle of computerized systems. According to GAMP-5 the computerized systems are classified in 4 categories based on their buildup strategy and configuration. Below are the different categories which are classified by GAMP-5:-

Category-1: Infrastructure Software: These software/ elements are designed in such a way as they can linked together and create an Infrastructure and work as a supporting environment i.e. Servers, Internet etc. for proper operation of main functioning software. For example: IT infrastructure, Server, network monitoring software, operating systems, security control system, Antivirus etc.

Category-3: Non-configure software: In this category standard software comes. These types of software are designed for all customers by using same configuration. No any additional changes or configuration can be done after release of version.

Category-4: Configured software: In this category such type of software designed as they can be configured later according to customer requirements. In this type of application different configurations are available at time of software design and same package are released. As per customer requirements after release the software the required configuration can be enabled and can be used. For example: SAP, LIMS, Chromeleon, Labsolution, Empower software are best example of Category-4 software.

Category-5: Custom build application: In this category such type of software/application designed they can be customer specific only. In this category same application can be different for individual organization. A special script required for programing to build this type of application and these scripts are customer specific.

 

There is slight difference in each category software and based on design pattern these software are classified in above mentioned category. And based on their classified category the validation strategy will be changed. Hence it is most important to understand proper differentiation between all categories of GAMP-5.

When any pharmaceutical unit thinks to introduce new computerized system then below activity need to follow:

                                 Flow diagram of CSV

Change Control Procedure: The change control should be initiated for introduction of new computerized system. The CSV team will define a paper plan and accordingly action item will mention in change request along with time line to complete the task within stipulated time line.

The first step is preparation of URS (User Requirement Specification) hence we can also initiate one change request only for preparation of URS and selection of vendor. If any vendor finalized to fulfill our requirements then another change request can be initiated to complete the further activity. Because of sometime long time elapse for selection of vendor or design such type of application who fulfill the requirements hence it would be better the second option for initiation of change request.

Preparation of  URS (User Requirement Specification): URS is a documented specification which contains all the basic requirements i.e. Design, operation, functionality, service relevant, risk reducing, comply regulatory requirements, IT infrastructure as vendor can easily understand  what actually requirements of customer.

In URS some points will be mandatory and some points will be non-mandatory as they can be optional.

Selection of Vendor: After finalization of URS, same should be send to multiple vendors and collect information regarding vendor background, their compatibility; from how much time he provides the service, which vendor committed to fulfill the all required or maximum required points of URS. In case of system breakdown which type of service he will provide and what will be strategy to resolve the breakdown. Is vendor certified with regulatory agencies or meet the regulatory requirements.

Based on provided data or information from vendor, shortlist the suitable vendor. If required vendor audit can be performed. The vendor audit can be done onsite or postal audit. Based on vendor response, vendor audit, vendor assessment a suitable vendor can be finalized who will provide respective computerized system.

GxP Assessment: After finalization of URS and selection of vendor it is most important to understand as respective system will classify in which type of either GxP or Non-GxP system. Based on GxP and non-GxP computerized system their validation strategy will change.

For non-GxP systems, very short steps required for validation i.e. for some of systems only Installation qualification is sufficient however, for GxP systems a complex procedure available to validate at every angle of compliance.

Risk Assessment:- Risk assessment to be perform before introduction of system. Risk assessment to be done based on system design, infrastructure, quality of used material in system, power consumption, Environment Health and Safety view, Fire safety, data loss, Operation, maintenance, waste material etc. Based on risk assessment and available control it should be decided that respective system is suitable or not. If it will be part of organization then what control should be required to eliminate risk.

Purchase Order: After GxP assessment and after finalization of Vendor, Purchase order to be generates to start the procurement procedure of system. In PO stage, vendor quotation plays an important role because of value of money. In quotation vendor mentioned price rates, discounts, covered services, validity of quotation etc. Based on suitable quotation and vendor evaluation final PO send to that vendor who is fit for company.

Validation Plan: Validation plan is that document where a complete strategy mentioned for qualification of document. The validation plan contains from description of system to till system retirement strategy.

Which document to be prepared and how it will be executed during validation, should be clearly mentioned in Validation plan. Who is going to perform IQ, OQ and PQ, it should be define in validation plan. During IQ, OQ, PQ, if any failure occurred and after release of system If any discrepancy occurred then how it will be handled, it should be mentioned in validation plan.

For documentation, document retention procedure should be clearly defined in validation plan. For backup and restoration, schedule review (periodic review) of system, incidence management system, history of vendor and which type of support will be provided from vendor etc. should be clearly defined in Validation plan.

In case of system failure, to continue the business plan a details strategy should be clearly defined in validation plan.

Installation Qualification (IQ): After approval of validation plan and after receiving of system at site, the Installation Qualification to be performed by vendor or authorized person of respective organization. During IQ, all the received part of system should be checked against PO and provided checklist from vendor. It should be ensured as the required system is provided be vendor according to URS.

The make, model, software version, software/ hardware firmware, physical condition of system should be checked and same should be documented. Proper commissioning of system, power supply check, startup of system, successful initialization of system, supply of required current, temperature and humidity in area at time of Installation and after Installation, should be documented.

Operational Qualification (OQ): After successful completion of Installation Qualification, the Operation Qualification to be initiated. During OQ, the Operational check should be performed i.e. Installed correctly, meets the design requirements, operates the way in which it was designed under load etc. A pre-defined strategy for OQ to be pre-approved and started accordingly. The OQ can be performed by vendor or authorized person of respective organization. The system should be checked by giving command through software or manually and also checked to meets the requirements of URS. If system meets and works according to pre-defined test parameter and defined criteria, then it will be considered as passed otherwise considered as failed. Same should be documented.

If any failure occurred during OQ, after taking appropriate QMS tools respective discrepancy can be resolved and retrospective validation should be performed for respective test or other relevant test also and observations should be documented.

Performance Qualification (PQ): After successful completion and approval of OQ, performance qualification can be proceed. During performance qualification, performance check of system i.e. accuracy of system, robustness of system, reproducibility of system being checked.

The definition of Performance Qualification is “Establishing confidence through appropriate testing that the finished product or process produced by a specified  process meets all released requirements for functionality and safety and that procedure are effectively and reproducible”.

In simple work we can say as the performance qualification is the executed test protocol documented evidence that confirm as respective system meets the defined requirements to function in the production environment.

Any qualification activity which was performed at vendor site should not be sufficient to direct release the system in production environment. At customer site, complete validation to be performed to ensure meets the requirements of URS.

The vendor can be performed his SAT at customer site and the approved protocol of customer is similar to vendor SAT protocol then respective SAT can be referred by customer and same can be documented.

Reference Traceability Matrix (RTM): This document provide the traceability to comply the every point of URS. It means in which document the respective requirement of URS is tested and validated. For Category 4 and Category 5 the RTM can be prepared at time of design stage or Functional specification and same can be documented to verify the meets the requirements of URS. For Category 3 applications, RTM can be prepared after completion of validation but before summaries the validation activity. If any test parameter found not performed then it can be performed separately in relevant protocol after proper documentation and taking approval of QA.

Summary Report: The summary report confirms as all the validation activity was completed successfully or not completed successfully. If any deviation or incidences happened during entire validation, it should be documented in summary report. Any test parameter which is pending due to any specific reason i.e. any further modification or any partial updation in system and same will not make impact in production environment; it should be properly documented in summary report with dedicated timeline and system can be released with limitation if any or without limitation.

Certification: After completion of validation summary report, certification of system release should be prepared which contains the details of system, version no., date of release and short summary of validation along with authorized signature.

Post Implementation activity:  The periodic review of system to be performed regularly to ensure proper functioning of system or to identify any requirement of upgradation. The backup and restoration is also most important part of computerized system to avoid any data loss due to in case of system failure.

When system life cycle is completed and system needs to retire then retirement procedure to be initiated after taking change request procedure. Before system retirement, Calibration to be performed (if applicable), all the data should be properly backup and stored in relevant drive or disk. All the users should be disabled. After that system can be retired. An alternative procedure should be available to view the data of respective system in future.

 Currently regulatory agencies are focusing on computerized system validation during their inspections. They checked which type of methodologies are followed during validation and which type of security controls are available in respective system. They ensure about data security, backup and restoration of data, backup and restoration validation and its frequency. They inspect audit trial, mainly administration audit trial, system audit trial, error and warnings, events logs, data audit trial, user access audit trial and generation of relevant audit trial respect to activity or events. Multiple Industries got 483’s on failure of electronic records

Previous
Next Post »